Category Archives: Courses

Favorite film scenes

For this assignment, choose a favorite film scene that is no more than 5 minutes long.

After showing the scene (I’ll have a laptop set up; just remember how to find the clip online), you will tell the class why you think this it is especially good.

Points to discuss:

  1. What are the factors that combine to make it an effective scene?
  2.  Is the language powerful? Explain.
  3.  Is the atmosphere important? Explain.


Please note: No songs, and no cartoons.



Leave a comment

Filed under GOV LC 3-RFT First-year program, Uncategorized

The passive voice and slavery

How Texas Teaches History


OCT. 21, 2015

A TEXAS high school student and his mother recently called attention to a curious line in a geography textbook: a description of the Atlantic slave trade as bringing “millions of workers” to plantations in the American South. McGraw-Hill Education, the publisher of the textbook, has since acknowledged that the term “workers” was a misnomer.

The company’s chief executive also promised to revise the textbook so that its digital version as well as its next edition would more accurately describe the forced migration and enslavement of Africans. In the meantime, the company is also offering to send stickers to cover the passage.

But it will take more than that to fix the way slavery is taught in Texas textbooks. In 2010, the Texas Board of Education approved a social studies curriculum that promotes capitalism and Republican political philosophies. The curriculum guidelines prompted many concerns, including that new textbooks would downplay slavery as the cause of the Civil War.

This fall, five million public school students in Texas began using the textbooks based on the new guidelines. And some of these books distort history not through word choices but through a tool we often think of as apolitical: grammar.

In September, Bobby Finger of the website Jezebel obtained and published some excerpts from the new books, showing much of what is objectionable about their content. The books play down the horror of slavery and even seem to claim that it had an upside. This upside took the form of a distinctive African-American culture, in which family was central, Christianity provided “hope,” folk tales expressed “joy” and community dances were important social events.

But it is not only the substance of the passages that is a problem. It is also their form. The writers’ decisions about how to construct sentences, about what the subject of the sentence will be, about whether the verb will be active or passive, shape the message that slavery was not all that bad.

I teach freshman writing at Dartmouth College. My colleagues and I consistently try to convey to our students the importance of clear writing. Among the guiding principles of clear writing are these: Whenever possible, use human subjects, not abstract nouns; use active verbs, not passive. We don’t want our students to write, “Torture was used,” because that sentence obscures who was torturing whom.

In the excerpts published by Jezebel, the Texas textbooks employ all the principles of good, strong, clear writing when talking about the “upside” of slavery. But when writing about the brutality of slavery, the writers use all the tricks of obfuscation. You can see all this at play in the following passage from a textbook, published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, called Texas United States History:

Some slaves reported that their masters treated them kindly. To protect their investment, some slaveholders provided adequate food and clothing for their slaves. However, severe treatment was very common. Whippings, brandings, and even worse torture were all part of American slavery.

Notice how in the first two sentences, the “slavery wasn’t that bad” sentences, the main subject of each clause is a person: slaves, masters, slaveholders. What those people, especially the slave owners, are doing is clear: They are treating their slaves kindly; they are providing adequate food and clothing. But after those two sentences there is a change, not just in the writers’ outlook on slavery but also in their sentence construction. There are no people in the last two sentences, only nouns. Yes, there is severe treatment, whippings, brandings and torture. And yes, those are all bad things. But where are the slave owners who whippings, brandings and torture. And yes, those are all bad things. But where are the slave owners who were actually doing the whipping and branding and torturing? And where are the slaves who were whipped, branded and tortured? They are nowhere to be found in the sentence.

In another passage, slave owners and their institutionalized cruelty are similarly absent: “Families were often broken apart when a family member was sold to another owner.”

Note the use of the passive voice in the verbs “were broken apart” and “was sold.” If the sentence had been written according to the principles of good draftsmanship, it would have looked like this: Slave owners often broke slave families apart by selling a family member to another owner. A bit more powerful, no?

Through grammatical manipulation, the textbook authors obscure the role of slave owners in the institution of slavery.

It may appear at first glance that the authors do a better job of focusing on the actions of slaves. After all, there are many sentences in which “slaves” are the subjects, the main characters in their own narrative.

But what are the verbs in those sentences? Are the slaves suffering? No, in the sentences that feature slaves as the subject, as the main actors in the sentence, the slaves are contributing their agricultural knowledge to the growing Southern economy; they are singing songs and telling folk tales; they are expressing themselves through art and dance.

There are no sentences, in these excerpts, anyway, in which slaves are doing what slaves actually did: toiling relentlessly, without remuneration or reprieve, constantly subject to confinement, corporal punishment and death.

The textbook publishers were put in a difficult position. They had to teach history to Texas’ children without challenging conservative political views that are at odds with history. In doing so, they made many grammatical choices. Though we don’t always recognize it, grammatical choices can be moral choices, and these publishers made the wrong ones.

Leave a comment

Filed under GOV LC 3-RFT First-year program, Uncategorized

Che Guevara and the Cuban Revolution

GOV 291 Riots, Rebellions and Revolutions Spring 2016

In roughly 1500 words (not many fewer than that), address the following.

Watch the film “The Motorcycle Diaries,” and discuss the formative experiences of Che Guevara in the light of the aims and achievements of the Cuban Revolution (as discussed in Chapter 5 of the DeFronzo book).  Also include at least three of Guevara’s writings on this page.  What were Guevara’s main social concerns, and where did they develop, according to the film?  How are they reflected in his writings?  How are they reflected in the aims and achievements of the Cuban Revolution?

Due Monday April 18 in class.  Emailed papers not accepted.  For more information on how your paper will be graded, see this link.

Leave a comment

Filed under assignments, Courses, GOV 253 Politics of Terrorism, Uncategorized

2nd Gulf war: the arguments

In roughly 750 words, due in class on Tuesday March 29th, address the following question.

In the debate between Hitchens, Galston and Weigel, which are the most and least convincing points made by each?





Leave a comment

Filed under assignments, GOV 355 US For Pol, Uncategorized

Black Panthers: Reform or Revolution?

In the early 1970s, the Black Panther Party split into two factions.  The reformist wing was led by Huey Newton, and the revolutionary wing by Eldridge Cleaver.  

Using the readings from Weeks 4-6, write a dialogue of roughly 1750 words (include the word count) between Newton and Cleaver, dated in roughly 1970, which focuses on how to interpret Marx. 

Address the following points:

  1.  What are the specific circumstances that the black community faces that need to be changed?   2. Is the proper and most effective interpretation of Marx the one offered by Lenin and the other revolutionaries? Or by those reformers who believed that oppression and exploitation could be solved peacefully, working within the existing system?  3. What are the drawbacks of each approach?   4. Which strategy is most likely to work to the benefit of the black people?  

Be sure to use all the relevant readings and address all the points above.  Due Monday March 21st in class.

Leave a comment

Filed under Courses, Riots, Rebellions and Revolutions, Uncategorized

Vietnam paper

PO 355 U.S. Foreign Policy
Prof. Snow
Spring 2016

Due March 15th, in class

No late papers accepted Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Courses, GOV 355 US For Pol, Uncategorized

Riots, Rebellions images








Leave a comment

Filed under Riots, Rebellions and Revolutions, Uncategorized